QUICK ANSWER
Start with one dependable primary role, add area coverage, protect enough priority pressure, then remove combinations that create too much movement burden or upgrade commitment.
Build around the job your current run needs instead of copying an unsupported named meta.
QUICK ANSWER
Start with one dependable primary role, add area coverage, protect enough priority pressure, then remove combinations that create too much movement burden or upgrade commitment.
Choose Beginner Safety, Wave Clear, Priority Targets or Balanced Progression. A goal changes which loadout quality matters most, so do not rank every weapon on one universal axis.
Label the exact weapons you use. Decide which slot supplies range, area coverage and priority pressure, then record mobility burden and upgrade commitment as costs rather than strengths.
Use 0 to 3 after testing similar runs. Leave a value blank when you cannot judge it. The planner averages only supplied ratings and publishes the goal weights beside the result.
If area coverage is weak, add or improve the slot that controls groups. If priority pressure is weak, protect a focused option. If burden is high, trade raw impact for movement freedom.
Change one slot or upgrade plan at a time, then repeat a similar wave condition. This separates a useful improvement from a lucky run or unrelated progression change.
Duplicate roles can leave one important problem completely unanswered.
Leave the rating blank; the tool will reduce confidence or withhold the score.
A powerful-looking set can still fail when recovery or aiming closes every exit.
Concentrate Keys on a complete role plan, using visible costs from your game.
There is no universal named build here. A strong plan covers groups, priority targets and movement while keeping upgrade commitment manageable.
Enter two to six slots. Rate at least three dimensions for each entered slot before using the personal-fit score.
At least one entered slot lacks three ratings. The planner withholds one headline score rather than treating unknown values as zero.
No. It uses your 0–3 observations and published editorial weights; it does not use hidden weapon or enemy statistics.